The resolution proposed by Islamic nations was adopted with 32 “yes” votes, 9 abstentions and three “no” votes cast by The United States, Israel’s closest ally, Italy and the Netherlands.

First off, this was not a peaceful flotilla, the people on board were radicals with a hatred against Israel

These people ‘carrying aid’ to the Gaza Strip were not peaceful, as shown in the videos. The Liberal media depicts the people as peaceful. Not so. Obama has so far declined to comment, he probably never will.

But think of it this way: he has never condemned radical Muslims or Jihad. That’s the tell tale sign right there.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”

That is the opening to the Declaration of Independence, strikes a chord no?

This is essentially why the Constitution was instituted! So that a government like this one would not take over, ignore the voices of the people, and wave it in our faces.

It’s time to stop them, come November, let us pray the American people have woken up to the fact that their freedom is being taken away before their very eyes.

It’s time to take a stand against these people, it’s time to tell them that we will be heard!

November 2010: Change you can believe in.

To name a few:

1. Shovel-ready

“Apparently, the generally accepted definition of this phrase is to imply that a project has been completely designed and all that is left to do is to implement it…however, when something dies, it, too, is shovel-ready for burial and so I get confused about the meaning. I would suggest that we just say the project is ready to implement.” – Jerry Redington, Keosauqua, Iowa.

(So we should ban a word based on your confusion?)

2. Transparent/Transparency

“In the lexicon of the political arena, this word is supposed to mean obvious or easily understood. In reality, political transparency is more invisible than obvious!” — Deb Larson, Bellaire, Mich.

(Somebody was a little transparent with their comments)

3. Czar

“The president has been handing these “czar” positions out like party favors.” – Scott Lassiter, Houston, Tex.

(AMEN)

4. Tweet

“People tweet and retweet and I just heard the word ‘tweet’ so many times it lost all meaning.” – Ricardo, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico.

(I would love to meet this guy and talk in tweets)

5. App

“Is there an ‘app’ for making this annoying word go away? Why can’t we just call them ‘programs’ again?” – Kuahmel Allah, Los Angeles, Calif.

(We can see who’s technologically challenged)

6. Sexting

“Any dangerous new trend that also happens to have a clever mash-up of words, involves teens, and gets television talk show hosts interested must be banished.” – Ishmael Daro, Saskatoon, Sask., Canada.

(Sexting is a wrong thing to do, but what Mr. Daro is implying is that we should ban everything that has a clever mash up of words, involves teen and get television talk show hosts to talk)

7. Friend As A Verb

Came into popularity through social networking websites. You add someone to your network by “friending” them, or remove them by “unfriending” them.

“‘Befriend’ is much more pleasant to the human ear and a perfectly useful word in the dictionary.” – Kevin K., Morris, Okla.

(Somebody must not have many Facebook friends)

8. Teachable Moment

What might otherwise be known as ‘a lesson.’

“It’s a condescending substitute for ‘opportunity to make a point,’” says Eric Rosenquist of College Station, Tex.

(Hehehehehehehehhehe)

9. In These Economic Times…

Nominations concerning the economy started rolling in as the 2009 list was being put together last year, i.e. “bailout.” They kept coming this year, in these trouble economic times. ” South Park ” warned us about what would happen if we angered The Economy.

“Overused and redundant. Aren’t ALL times ‘these economic times’?” — Barb Stutesman, Three Rivers, Mich.

(According to Obama)

10. Stimulus

“Everything in the news is about the stimulus packages…it is no longer a grant, it’s stimulus money, stimulus checks, etc. I think it is just being over-used.” Teri Heikkila, Rudyard, Mich.

(I wonder how she would react to the word ‘Porkulus’)

11. Toxic Assets

“Whatever happened to simply ‘bad stocks,’ ‘debts,’ or ‘loans’?” — Monty Heidenreich, Homewood, Ill.

(I can’t help but laugh at these pansies)

12. To Big To Fail

“Just for the record, nothing’s too big to fail unless the government lets it.” Claire Shefchik, Brooklyn, NY.

(She’s in for a surprise!)

13. Bromance

“I am sick of combined words the media creates to make them sound catchier. Frenemies? Bromances? Blogorrhea? I’m going to scream!” – Kaylynn, Alberta, Canada.

(I’m about to puke)

14. Chillaxin’

“Heard everywhere from MTV to ESPN to CNN. A bothersome term that seeks to combine chillin’ with relaxin’ makes me want to be ‘axin’ this word.” – Tammy, Sault Ste. Marie, Mich.

(We happen to like our ’90s lingo thank you very much!)

15. Obama – prefix or roots

The LSSU Word Banishment Committee held out hope that folks would want to Obama-ban Obama-structions, but were surprised that no one Obama-nominated any, such as these compiled by the Oxford Dictionary in 2009: Obamanomics, Obamanation, Obamafication, Obamacare, Obamalicious, Obamaland….We say Obamanough already.

(It’s just a fad, we’ll be using it as an insult in the coming years)

They’ll probably need to add another one to the list:

“Get a life”

They’ll be hearing that often.

Official website of LSSU click here

Climate change skeptics describe the leaked data as a “smoking gun,” evidence of collusion among climatologists and manipulation of data to support the widely held view that climate change is caused by the actions of mankind. The files were reportedly released on a Russian file-serve by an anonymous poster calling himself “FOIA.”

In an exclusive interview in Investigate magazine’s TGIF Edition, Phil Jones, the head of the Hadley CRU, confirmed that the leaked data is real. [1]

A spokesperson for the University of East Anglia said: “We are aware that information from a server used for research information in one area of the university has been made available on public websites. Because of the volume of this information we cannot currently confirm that all this material is genuine. This information has been obtained and published without our permission and we took immediate action to remove the server in question from operation. We are undertaking a thorough internal investigation and have involved the police in this inquiry.”

In one email, dated November 1999, one scientist wrote: “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature [the science journal] trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie, from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.”

This sentence, in particular, has been leapt upon by sceptics as evidence of manipulating data, but the credibility of the email has not been verified. The scientists who allegedly sent it declined to comment on the email. [2]

BBC’s environmental analyst Roger Harrabin had this to say:

My contacts at the CRU tell me the e-mails are being taken out of context and insist they are part of the normal hurly-burly of conversations between scientists working on some of the most complicated questions of our times.

They ask how many of us would feel completely comfortable if our own inboxes were emptied out for the world to see. How much of what we had said to close colleagues in industry jargon would be liable to misinterpretation?…

…My CRU source points out that its unpublished full data set is almost identical to the ones at the National Climatic Data Center and the Goddard Institute of Space Studies.

Both of these are in the US, where there are no restrictions on publication. The CRU view is that when the sceptics see the full data in due course they will be very disappointed.

The scientific establishment is likely to support the CRU. Despite continuing uncertainties in some areas of climate science, they say officially that their overall confidence that humans are warming the climate is now more than 90%.

One leading figure told me unofficially that confidence was now at 99%.

But the e-mail controversy may prove an uncomfortable moment in the careers of some of researchers in the spotlight and will undoubtedly provoke demands for renewed scrutiny of the CRU’s influential work.

These demands are likely to surface in the US Senate, where climate change sceptics and their supporters are holding up the energy and climate bill which President Barack Obama needs before he can sign a legally binding agreement over cutting emissions. [3]

I don’t see how the emails could’ve been taken out of context, Telegraph blogger James Delingpole posted a few excerpts:

Manipulation of evidence:

I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.

Private doubts about whether the world really is heating up:

The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.

Suppression of evidence:

Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?

Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.

Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.

We will be getting Caspar to do likewise. [4]

I don’t see how these were taken out of context, and the most complicated question of our time? (The answer is 42 by the way) Really? “Is the world heating up?” can be a little tricky to say sometimes…

Finally, people are waking up to see that these Liberal environmental wackos are making things up, they’re not as bad as Hilary Clinton, but at least they got people to believe them.

The only thing he’s done is…jack and squat.  Fail after fail after miserable fail.

What irks me the most is his czars!  His wonderful czars!  If they’re so wonderful…then how come they’re under so much scrutiny?!

Lets take a look at the worst of the worst:

Van Jones, ex-Green Jobs Czar:

Jones was forced out of his position in September after the press ‘reported’ that Jones called the Republicans “a–holes” and signed a 9/11 ‘Truther” (It said that Bush was behind the terrorist attacks)

He was hand picked by the White House’s consigliere Valerie Jarrett (read Michelle Malkin’s book Culture of Corruption to find out Jarret’s ties with Michelle Obama) and he was a registered communist.

After being arrested during the 1993 Rodney King riots, Van found his jail time life changing, “I met all these…really radical communists and anarchists. And it was like, ‘This is what I wanted to be apart of’…by August I was a communist” (The [Oakland, CA] East Bay Express 2005)
Correct me if I’m wrong…but didn’t we used to throw communists in jail? Now we’re putting them in top positions in the White House! Crazy how much our world has changed!

Next on the list is a real nut job,

John Holdren, Science Czar:

Pretty much an environmental Liberal wack-job.  He coauthored the 1977 text book with the Liberal freak Paul R. Ehrlich called Ecoscience, Population, Resources, Environment. In book he encouraged forced abortions, restrictions of family sizes (a.k.a. China), seizure of illegitimate children and sterilants added to the water supply.  They both argued that the Constitution supported ‘compulsory’ abortion but did not allow an unlimited right to have children.  Holdren and Ehrlich also agreed to a transitional “Planetary regime” to control the global economy and dictate, by force, the number of children allowed to be born on earth.  Sick right?

Next up is,

Kevin Jennings, School Safety Czar:

Another perfect example of Obama’s moral friends.  This former schoolteacher once told one of his 15 year old students who was being sexually abused by an older man to “wear a condom”.  Jennings is very, very far from ‘safe’.  He has advocated his entire career that a radical gay agenda, founded by the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) be taught in schools.  At a 2000 gay and lesbian rally in Iowa, he claimed that “we all know what’s really promoted in our schools: heterosexuality…Every time kids read ‘Romeo and Juliet” or they’re encouraged to go the the prom or whatever it is, kids are aggressively recruited to be heterosexual in this country”.  He has also advocated to kick the Boy Scouts out of all public schools and admired Harry Hay who supports the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).

Do you really wonder why we’re heterosexual?  Because God made us that way!

Sheesh, the last to bat is,

Cass Sunstein, Regulatory Czar

This next wacko was recruited by…lets let you think about it for a second…yes, Valarie Jarrett.  Sunstein has been given unlimited power to draft federal regulations for virtually every federal agency.  Sunstein is an advocate to the good ‘ol European style socialism and to only reason, he says, it hasn’t happened yet is because of…yes, racism.  He claims that socialism “would disproportionately benefit African Americans…and Hispanics.”  Sunstein has also advocated: the return of the Fairness Doctrine, a ban on all enforced organ donation (by changing the policy to ‘presumed consent’); giving animals the “right” to bring suit for animal cruelty.

Really?

Well, as you can see, you people who voted for Obama made a very wise choice!  He’s allied himself with communists, socialists and radical left leaning people.  The worst of the worst.  If they get their agenda passed, we will no longer be the United States of America, but the United Socialist States of America.

The 220-215 vote cleared the way for the Senate to begin a long-delayed debate on the issue that has come to overshadow all others in Congress.

A triumphant Speaker Nancy Pelosi likened the legislation to the passage of Social Security in 1935 and Medicare 30 years later — and Obama issued a statement saying, “I look forward to signing it into law by the end of the year.” [1]

Lets be realistic for one second here, shall we? First off, why would adding 1.2 trillion dollars to our already 4.5 trillion dollar debt help us?

When I have to pay for it! All the kids do! My children will pay for it! I’ll be in debt for the rest of my natural existence and Obama and his Liberal team of boobs could care less! I mean, has anyone read the 1,990 page bill? If you did, you wouldn’t be defending it!

Read Bill here

The age of prosperity is over, the age of socialism has begun! Now that’s change you can’t believe is happening!

This is a very sick attack on Christianity and a very sick portrayal of Jesus.

I support Prop 8 because I don’t want laws allowing unmoral sexual orientation.

But, what do you think? Are you a supporter of Prop 8? Despise anyone who supports it and call them hate-mongers? Or you just don’t care?

Take our poll:

John Satawa, of Warren, Mich., filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court on Friday in an attempt to be allowed to put back the 8- by 8-foot Nativity scene his late father built in 1945.

After receiving a complaint by the Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation last December, the Road Commission of Macomb County told Satawa to remove the holiday display, citing incomplete permits. Satawa’s permit application was later denied because it “clearly displays a religious message” and violated “separation of church and state,” Macomb County Highway Engineer Robert Hoepfner wrote.

Satawa says he simply wants to restore the “tradition” on the median between Mound and Chicago Roads outside of St. Anne’s Parish Church.

“The Nativity display has been a tradition not just for my family, but for the whole community for 63 years,” Satawa told Foxnews.com in a statement. “I am disappointed the Road Commission would not stand up for our community and our Constitution and that is why I was compelled to file this lawsuit.”

According to Satawa’s lawsuit, St. Anne’s Parish received a donation of Christmas statues in March 1945 that were too large to house inside the church — so they were moved to the public median outside. Jack Eckstein, president of the village of Warren at the time, granted permission for the move.

“As a result, a Christmas tradition was born,” the lawsuit reads.

The Nativity display has been there every Christmas season since, except for one — 1996 — when there was road construction. The creche returned the following year, according to the lawsuit.

But last year, just 14 days before Christmas, Satawa received a letter from the Macomb County Road Commission instructing him to “immediately remove” the Nativity scene within 30 days. Satawa removed the structure and was denied a permit when he reapplied in January. In March, he received a formal denial of his petition to erect the nativity scene because, according to county officials, it would be a violation of the First Amendment, which prohibits government from making laws “respecting an establishment of religion.”

“It boils down to maintaining a tradition that’s been going on for six decades and one letter received from an out-of-state radical organization,” attorney Brian Rooney of the Thomas More Law Center told Foxnews.com. “We believe this shows hostility towards Christianity.”

The Thomas More Law Center filed the lawsuit on Satawa’s behalf, alleging the Road Commission’s restriction violates his First Amendment rights and equal protection guarantee under the Fourteenth Amendment.

“We’re very confident,” Rooney said. “We believe the law of the Constitution is on our side.”

But Ben Aloia, an attorney representing the Macomb County Road Commission, disagreed, citing Allegheny v. ACLU of Pittsburgh, in which the Supreme Court held in 1989 that a county government’s Nativity scene displayed at a courthouse was an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.

“We believe that our decision is in line with that rule of law,” Aloia said. “The fact is, he’s never acquired a formal permit to install this Nativity scene.”

Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, said the creche is also a traffic hazard.

“You can’t see around it,” she told Foxnews.com. “We are a nation of rules and laws, and that law even applies to St. Anne’s Parish. I can’t understand why they can’t put the scene on their church grounds. They’re trying to take over public property for their religious purposes, and that’s not allowed.”

Rooney said an emergency injunction will be filed within the next two weeks in an attempt to make sure the Nativity scene returns in time for the upcoming holiday season.

Satawa, meanwhile, says he has received support from hundreds of neighbors.

“This response is the USA I like,” he said, “people that are not afraid to stand up for what is right.” [1]

Amen!

Separation of church and state is a political and legal doctrine that government and religious institutions are to be kept separate and independent from each other. [2] The term most often refers to the combination of two principles: secularity of government and freedom of religious exercise.

Reflecting a concept often credited in its original form to the English political philosopher John Locke, the phrase separation of church and state is generally traced to the letter written by Thomas Jefferson in 1802 to the Danbury Baptists , in which he referred to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as creating a “wall of separation” between church and state. The phrase was quoted by the United State’s Supreme Court first in 1878, and then in a series of cases starting in 1947. This led to increased popular and political discussion of the concept. [3]

Our country was not founded on Islam, our country was not founded on Mormonism, our country was not founded on Jehovah’s Witnesses it was founded by the Christian’s. No matter how many times people deny this, it’s a fact, that we are “One nation under God, indivisible”

And no one can take that away from us.

Internment/Resettlement (I/R) Specialists in the Army are primarily responsible for day-to-day operations in a military confinement/correctional facility or detention/internment facility. I/R Specialists provide rehabilitative, health, welfare, and security to U.S. military prisoners within a confinement or correctional facility; conduct inspections; prepare written reports; and coordinate activities of prisoners/internees and staff personnel.

Some of your duties as an Internment/Resettlement Specialist may include:

• Assist with the supervision and management of confinement and detention operations
• Provide external security to confinement/corrections facilities or detention/internment facilities
• Provide counseling and guidance to individual prisoners within a rehabilitative program
• Prepare or review reports and records of prisoners/internees and programs

Job training for an Internment/Resettlement Specialist requires nine weeks of Basic Training, where you’ll learn basic Soldiering skills, and eight weeks of Advanced Individual Training. Part of this time is spent in the classroom and part in a field environment. Some of the skills you’ll learn are:

 

• Military laws and jurisdictions
• Level of Force Procedures
• Unarmed Self-Defense Techniques
• Police Deviance and Ethics Procedures
• Interpersonal Communications Skills
• Close confinement operations
• Search and restraint procedures
• Use of firearms
• Custody and control procedures

Helpful attributes include:

• An ability to think and react quickly
• An ability to remain calm in stressful situations
• An interest in law enforcement and crime prevention
• Being physically fit

Advanced level Internment/Resettlement Specialist provides guidance, supervises and trains other Soldiers within the same discipline. As an advanced level I/R Specialist, you may be involved in:

• Supervise and establish all administrative, logistical and food support operations, confinement/correctional, custodial, treatment, and rehabilitative activities
• Responsible for all personnel working in the confinement/correctional facility, including security, logistical, and administrative management of the prisoner/internee population
• Provide command and control, staff planning, administration/logistical services, and custody/control for the operation of an Enemy Prisoner of War/Civilian Internee (EPW/CI) camp
• Provide command and control, staff planning, administration/logistical services, and custody/control for the operation of detention facility or the operation of a displaced civilian (DC) resettlement facility

The skills you’ll learn as an Internment/Resettlement Specialist will help prepare you for a future with federal, state, county or city law enforcement agencies or the federal penal system. You might also be able to pursue a career as a security guard with industrial firms, airports or other businesses and institutions.

• Military Police (31B)

• Military Police (31B)
• Criminal Investigations (CID) Special Agent (31D)

Learn more about the relationship between military training and civilian certification requirements.